MEETING NOTES & MEDIATION WRAP-UP
August 3, 2015
Operating Instructions - this document is two
things: our notes our meeting with Jon on 8/3 and our opinions and conclusions
having now spoken with both Jon and Moshe. They are intermingled because they
follow a shared path. We are pretty embedded in these issues, now, so if there
are sections that require more
FIRST, an IMMEDIATE NEED: Get
contents out of building. Jon is working on securing limited climate-controlled
storage, pieces will need to be prioritized for that--all other artifacts
brought to HQ space Moshe has secured. Jon & Moshe to
talk with MoH building owner when he returns from
vacation on Thursday.
Jon
talked about his relationship to physics, imaging, and holography, the
connections heÕs made with artists, and institutions.
There
was a brief discussion about what brought us to the need for mediation, the
Soho House show issue(s). It seems to stem from a fundamental disagreement on
the purpose of the show. Possibly poorly communicated, or scope creeped during process. Jon believed it was to highlight
holography and generate interest in holography using the Chicago collection and
other landmark pieces. Moshe believed it was to feature the rescue and
revitalization effort of Loren BillingsÕ Museum of Holography. Collapse came over
disagreement on what would be shown - only LorenÕs collection, or other pieces
from the HoloCenter in NY to show the ŌbestĶ of what
holography has to offer. All conflicts around this show stemmed from this
misalignment, or tensions after fall-out.
OUR OPINION: The decision to remove Jon from Slack runs counter to the
mission and should be reversed immediately.
Jon
is committed to launching an institution dedicated to holography to have the
holograms on display and engage artists, host residencies, create new art,
build upon the collection in Chicago. At this juncture
Jon
related his story of knowing the museum, learning of the HoloRescue
1.0 project, getting in touch with Moshe.
Jon
discussed the history of the building from the bankÕs repossession and sale
following LorenÕs financial collapse through current ownershipÕs purchase of
the building - including whatÕs known about two groups of the collection
taken/sold by LorenÕs family before we became involved
Jon
discussed the state of relationship between Moshe/HoloRescue
and the building owner at the time (Hayden Connor); discussed his negotiation
and acquisition of building contents
Learned
of Agreed-upon Mission: Ōto keep the collection intact and on public
display in ChicagoĶ
Learned
of Agreed-upon Tasks: Regain control of MoH
contents from Hayden Connor, relocate the contents, curate a gallery including
open lab where preservation efforts can occur, begin development of hololab with objective of creating self-sustaining
business, and honor Loren & Bob Billings as part of this effort.
OUR CONCLUSION: both parties believe they had an understanding of the plan
on how to proceed after acquisition of building contents. Jon thought he was
acquiring and then partnering with or forming an organization. Moshe thought
Jon was acquiring on behalf of that organization, though that organization
didnÕt exist at the time (still doesnÕt)
ŌRealityĶ
in a legal sense: The contents of the MoH building
belong to a private individual. Per above, that individual is committed to
creating a place for holograms in Chicago.
That
said, Jon does not feel that ownership has to work
this way forever - all options are on the table in the future for discussion.
OUR OPINION: Pressure exerted on Jon to commit to a particular ownership
structure or hand-over before we proceed is not productive and does not support
the mission.
OUR CONCLUSION: We do not see evidence of a two-sided agreement to put the
pieces in a public trust or donate after death. The confusion/disagreement over
what would happen to pieces is somewhat moot--they were legally purchased (Bill
of Sale exists) by an individual (Jon), not a co-op or entity.
We
discussed the idea that some volunteers will likely not want to support an
entity based around what is, right now, a private collection.
OUR OPINION: In our opinion the volunteer corps were
not properly briefed on the collectionÕs private ownership status. It is
plausible that this is the result of MosheÕs belief in the co-op arrangement.
We discussed potential scenarios for the future of the
collection and a HoloCenter, such as Jon showing the
pieces, even potentially granting license to, an entity that Moshe establishes
around Holography in Chicago, or a scenario where Jon pursues that sort of
facility himself.
OUR OVERALL CONCLUSION: The relationship between Moshe and Jon is
highly strained. If the disagreements outlined above cannot be reconciled,
progress toward the mission is unlikely. We believe it must be acknowledged
that the collection is private by both parties and plot a course through to
continue support of the mission.
NEXT STEPS: We stand ready to facilitate a sit-down between the
parties, but we do not believe arguing the past points, disagreements, or
conflicts will result in anything worthwhile. Success will hinge on an
unwavering focus forward based on todayÕs reality.
Meeting
Attendees: Jon, Tom Fennell, Cate Brady, Tamara Biggs, Heather
Robbins